# Difference between revisions of "Colloquia"

(→October 23, 2020, Jeremy Quastel (University of Toronto)) |
|||

(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||

Line 11: | Line 11: | ||

(Hosted by Gurevitch) | (Hosted by Gurevitch) | ||

+ | |||

+ | '''From theoretic computer science to algebraic geometry: how the complexity of matrix multiplication led me to the Hilbert scheme of points.''' | ||

+ | |||

+ | In 1968 Strassen discovered the way we multiply nxn matrices | ||

+ | (row/column) | ||

+ | is not the most efficient algorithm possible. Subsequent work has led to | ||

+ | the astounding conjecture that as the size n of the matrices grows, it | ||

+ | becomes | ||

+ | almost as easy to multiply matrices as it is to add them. I will give a | ||

+ | history | ||

+ | of this problem and explain why it is natural to study it using | ||

+ | algebraic geometry | ||

+ | and representation theory. I will conclude by discussing recent exciting | ||

+ | developments | ||

+ | that explain the second phrase in the title. | ||

== October 9, 2020, [https://impa.br/en_US/page-pessoas/carolina-araujo/ Carolina Araujo] (IMPA) == | == October 9, 2020, [https://impa.br/en_US/page-pessoas/carolina-araujo/ Carolina Araujo] (IMPA) == | ||

(Hosted by Ellenberg) | (Hosted by Ellenberg) | ||

+ | |||

+ | '''Symmetries in Algebraic Geometry and Cremona transformations''' | ||

+ | |||

+ | In this talk I will discuss symmetries of complex algebraic varieties. When studying a projective variety $X$, one usually wants to understand its symmetries. Conversely, the structure of the group of automorphisms of $X$ encodes relevant geometric properties of $X$. After describing some examples of automorphism groups of projective varieties, I will discuss why the notion of automorphism is too rigid in the scope of birational geometry. We are then led to consider another class of symmetries of $X$, its birational self-maps. Birational self-maps of the projective space $\mathbb{P}^n$ are called Cremona transformations. Describing the structure of the group of Cremona transformations of the plane is a classical problem that goes back to the 19th century. In higher dimensions, not so much is known, and a natural problem is to construct interesting subgroups of the Cremona group. I will end by discussing a recent work with Alessio Corti and Alex Massarenti, where we investigate subgroups of the Cremona group consisting of symmetries preserving some special meromorphic volume forms. | ||

== October 23, 2020, [http://www.math.toronto.edu/quastel/ Jeremy Quastel] (University of Toronto) == | == October 23, 2020, [http://www.math.toronto.edu/quastel/ Jeremy Quastel] (University of Toronto) == | ||

(Hosted by Gorin) | (Hosted by Gorin) | ||

+ | |||

+ | '''Towards KPZ Universality''' | ||

+ | |||

+ | The 1-d KPZ universality class contains random interface growth models | ||

+ | as well as random polymer free energies and driven diffusive systems. | ||

+ | The KPZ fixed point has now been determined, through the exact solution of a special model | ||

+ | in the class, TASEP, and is expected to describe the asymptotic fluctuations for all models in the class. | ||

+ | It is an integrable Markov process, with transition probabilities described by a system of integrable PDE’s. | ||

+ | Very recently, new techniques have become available to prove | ||

+ | the convergence of the KPZ equation itself, as well as some non-integrable extensions | ||

+ | of TASEP, to the KPZ fixed point. This talk will be a gentle introduction to these developments | ||

+ | with no prior knowledge assumed. The results are, variously, joint works with | ||

+ | Daniel Remenik, Konstantin Matetski, and Sourav Sarkar. | ||

== November 6, 2020, [http://math.jhu.edu/~sakellar/ Yiannis Sakellaridis] (Johns Hopkins University)== | == November 6, 2020, [http://math.jhu.edu/~sakellar/ Yiannis Sakellaridis] (Johns Hopkins University)== | ||

Line 24: | Line 56: | ||

(Hosted by Gurevitch) | (Hosted by Gurevitch) | ||

− | == November 20, 2020, | + | == November 20, 2020, [https://web.ma.utexas.edu/users/ntran/ Ngoc Mai Tran] (University of Texas) == |

− | |||

− | |||

− | |||

+ | (Hosted by Rodriguez) | ||

+ | == December 4, 2020, [http://math.sfsu.edu/federico/ Federico Ardila] (San Francisco) == | ||

+ | (Hosted by Ellenberg) | ||

== Past Colloquia == | == Past Colloquia == |

## Latest revision as of 19:35, 11 October 2020

**UW Madison mathematics Colloquium is ONLINE on Fridays at 4:00 pm. **

# Fall 2020

## September 25, 2020, Joseph Landsberg (Texas A&M)

(Hosted by Gurevitch)

**From theoretic computer science to algebraic geometry: how the complexity of matrix multiplication led me to the Hilbert scheme of points.**

In 1968 Strassen discovered the way we multiply nxn matrices (row/column) is not the most efficient algorithm possible. Subsequent work has led to the astounding conjecture that as the size n of the matrices grows, it becomes almost as easy to multiply matrices as it is to add them. I will give a history of this problem and explain why it is natural to study it using algebraic geometry and representation theory. I will conclude by discussing recent exciting developments that explain the second phrase in the title.

## October 9, 2020, Carolina Araujo (IMPA)

(Hosted by Ellenberg)

**Symmetries in Algebraic Geometry and Cremona transformations**

In this talk I will discuss symmetries of complex algebraic varieties. When studying a projective variety $X$, one usually wants to understand its symmetries. Conversely, the structure of the group of automorphisms of $X$ encodes relevant geometric properties of $X$. After describing some examples of automorphism groups of projective varieties, I will discuss why the notion of automorphism is too rigid in the scope of birational geometry. We are then led to consider another class of symmetries of $X$, its birational self-maps. Birational self-maps of the projective space $\mathbb{P}^n$ are called Cremona transformations. Describing the structure of the group of Cremona transformations of the plane is a classical problem that goes back to the 19th century. In higher dimensions, not so much is known, and a natural problem is to construct interesting subgroups of the Cremona group. I will end by discussing a recent work with Alessio Corti and Alex Massarenti, where we investigate subgroups of the Cremona group consisting of symmetries preserving some special meromorphic volume forms.

## October 23, 2020, Jeremy Quastel (University of Toronto)

(Hosted by Gorin)

**Towards KPZ Universality**

The 1-d KPZ universality class contains random interface growth models as well as random polymer free energies and driven diffusive systems. The KPZ fixed point has now been determined, through the exact solution of a special model in the class, TASEP, and is expected to describe the asymptotic fluctuations for all models in the class. It is an integrable Markov process, with transition probabilities described by a system of integrable PDE’s. Very recently, new techniques have become available to prove the convergence of the KPZ equation itself, as well as some non-integrable extensions of TASEP, to the KPZ fixed point. This talk will be a gentle introduction to these developments with no prior knowledge assumed. The results are, variously, joint works with Daniel Remenik, Konstantin Matetski, and Sourav Sarkar.

## November 6, 2020, Yiannis Sakellaridis (Johns Hopkins University)

(Hosted by Gurevitch)

## November 20, 2020, Ngoc Mai Tran (University of Texas)

(Hosted by Rodriguez)

## December 4, 2020, Federico Ardila (San Francisco)

(Hosted by Ellenberg)