Geometry and Topology Seminar
The Geometry and Topology seminar meets in room 901 of Van Vleck Hall on Fridays from 1:20pm - 2:10pm.
For more information, contact Richard Kent.
Contents
- 1 Spring 2013
- 2 Spring Abstracts
- 3 Fall 2012
- 4 Fall Abstracts
- 4.1 Owen Sizemore (Wisconsin)
- 4.2 Mireille Boutin (Purdue)
- 4.3 Ben Schmidt (Michigan State)
- 4.4 Ian Biringer (Boston College)
- 4.5 Peng Gao (Simons Center for Geometry and Physics)
- 4.6 Jo Nelson (Wisconsin)
- 4.7 Jennifer Taback (Bowdoin)
- 4.8 Jenny Wilson (Chicago)
- 4.9 Jonah Gaster (UIC)
- 4.10 Shinpei Baba (Caltech)
- 4.11 Kathryn Mann (Chicago)
- 5 Archive of past Geometry seminars
Spring 2013
date | speaker | title | host(s) |
---|---|---|---|
January 25 | Anne Thomas (Sydney) | Divergence in right-angled Coxeter groups | Dymarz |
February 1 | |||
February 8 | |||
February 15 | Liviu Nicolaescu (Notre Dame) | Random Morse functions and spectral geometry | Oh |
February 22 | |||
March 1 | Chris Hruska (UW Milwaukee) | Local topology of boundaries and isolated flats | Dymarz |
March 8 | |||
March 11, MONDAY! | Eriko Hironaka (FSU) | TBA | Kent |
March 15 | Yu-Shen Lin (Harvard) | TBA | Oh |
March 22 | |||
Spring Break | |||
April 5 | |||
April 12 | |||
April 19 | |||
April 26 | |||
May 3 | |||
May 10 |
Spring Abstracts
Anne Thomas (Sydney)
Divergence in right-angled Coxeter groups
Abstract: The divergence of a pair of geodesic rays emanating from a point is a measure of how quickly they are moving away from each other. In Euclidean space divergence is linear, while in hyperbolic space divergence is exponential. Gersten used this idea to define a quasi-isometry invariant for groups, also called divergence, which has been investigated for classes of groups including fundamental groups of 3-manifolds, mapping class groups and right-angled Artin groups. I will discuss joint work with Pallavi Dani on divergence in right-angled Coxeter groups (RACGs). We characterise 2-dimensional RACGs with quadratic divergence, and prove that for every positive integer d, there is a RACG with divergence polynomial of degree d.
Liviu Nicolaescu (Notre Dame)
Random Morse functions and spectral geometry
Abstract: I will discuss the distribution of critical values of a smooth random function on a compact m-dimensional Riemann manifold (M,g) described as a random superposition of eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. The notion of randomness that we use has a naturally built in small parameter $\varepsilon$, and we show that as $\varepsilon\to 0$ the distribution of critical values closely resemble the distribution of eigenvalues of certain random symmetric $(m+1)\times (m+1)$-matrices of the type introduced by E. Wigner in quantum mechanics. Additionally, I will explain how to recover the metric $g$ from statistical properties of the Hessians of the above random function.
Chris Hruska (UW Milwaukee)
Local topology of boundaries and isolated flats
Abstract: Swarup proved that every one-ended word hyperbolic group has a locally connected Gromov boundary. However for CAT(0) groups, non-locally connected boundaries are easy to construct. For instance the boundary of F_2 x Z is the suspension of a Cantor set.
In joint work with Kim Ruane, we have studied boundaries of CAT(0) spaces with isolated flats. If G acts properly, cocompactly on such a space X, we give a necessary and sufficient condition on G such that the boundary of X is locally connected. As a corollary, we deduce that such a group G is semistable at infinity.
Eriko Hironaka (FSU)
TBA
Yu-Shen Lin (Harvard)
TBA
Yuan-qi Wang (UCSB)
TBA
Fall 2012
date | speaker | title | host(s) |
---|---|---|---|
September 21 | Owen Sizemore (Wisconsin) | local | |
September 28 | Mireille Boutin (Purdue) | Mari Beffa | |
October 5 | Ben Schmidt (Michigan State) | Dymarz | |
October 12 | Ian Biringer (Boston College) |
Growth of Betti numbers and a probabilistic take on Gromov Hausdorff convergence |
Dymarz |
October 19 | Peng Gao (Simons Center for Geometry and Physics) | Wang | |
October 26 | Jo Nelson (Wisconsin) |
Cylindrical contact homology as a well-defined homology theory? Part I |
local |
November 2 | Jennifer Taback (Bowdoin) |
The geometry of twisted conjugacy classes in Diestel-Leader groups |
Dymarz |
November 9 | Jenny Wilson (Chicago) | Ellenberg | |
November 16 | Jonah Gaster (UIC) | Kent | |
Thanksgiving Recess | |||
November 30 | Shinpei Baba (Caltech) | Kent | |
December 7 | Kathryn Mann (Chicago) | Kent | |
Fall Abstracts
Owen Sizemore (Wisconsin)
Operator Algebra Techniques in Measureable Group Theory
Measurable group theory is the study of groups via their actions on measure spaces. While the classification for amenable groups was essentially complete by the early 1980's, progress for nonamenable groups has been slow to emerge. The last 15 years has seen a surge in the classification of ergodic actions of nonamenable groups, with methods coming from diverse areas. We will survey these new results, as well as, give an introduction to the operator algebra techniques that have been used.
Mireille Boutin (Purdue)
The Pascal Triangle of a discrete Image: definition, properties, and application to object segmentation
We define the Pascal Triangle of a discrete (gray scale) image as a pyramidal ar- rangement of complex-valued moments and we explore its geometric significance. In particular, we show that the entries of row k of this triangle correspond to the Fourier series coefficients of the moment of order k of the Radon transform of the image. Group actions on the plane can be naturally prolonged onto the entries of the Pascal Triangle. We study the induced action of some common group actions, such as translation, rotations, and reflections, and we propose simple tests for equivalence and self- equivalence for these group actions. The motivating application of this work is the problem of recognizing ”shapes” on images, for example characters, digits or simple graphics. Application to the MERGE project, in which we developed a fast method for segmenting hazardous material signs on a cellular phone, will be also discussed.
This is joint work with my graduate students Shanshan Huang and Andrew Haddad.
Ben Schmidt (Michigan State)
Three manifolds of constant vector curvature.
A Riemannian manifold M is said to have extremal curvature K if all sectional curvatures are bounded above by K or if all sectional curvatures are bounded below by K. A manifold with extremal curvature K has constant vector curvature K if every tangent vector to M belongs to a tangent plane of curvature K. For surfaces, having constant vector curvature is equivalent to having constant curvature. In dimension three, the eight Thurston geometries all have constant vector curvature. In this talk, I will discuss the classification of closed three manifolds with constant vector curvature. Based on joint work with Jon Wolfson.
Ian Biringer (Boston College)
Growth of Betti numbers and a probabilistic take on Gromov Hausdorff convergence
We will describe an asymptotic relationship between the volume and the Betti numbers of certain locally symmetric spaces. The proof uses an exciting new tool: a synthesis of Gromov-Hausdorff convergence of Riemannian manifolds and Benjamini-Schramm convergence from graph theory.
Peng Gao (Simons Center for Geometry and Physics)
string theory partition functions and geodesic spectrum
String theory partition functions often have nice modular properties, which is well understood within the context of representation theory of (supersymmetric extensions) of Virasoro algebra. However, many questions of physical importance are preferrably addressed when string theory is formulated in terms of non-linear sigma model on a Riemann surface with a Riemannian manifold as target space. Traditionally, physicists have studied such sigma models within the realm of perturbation theory, overlooking a large class of very natural critical points of the path integral, namely, closed geodesics on the target space Riemannian manifold. We propose how to take into account the effect of these critical points on the path integral, and initiate its study on Ricci flat targe spaces, such as the K3 surface.
Jo Nelson (Wisconsin)
Cylindrical contact homology as a well-defined homology theory? Part I
In this talk I will define all the concepts in the title, starting with what a contact manifold is. I will also explain how the heuristic arguments sketched in the literature since 1999 fail to define a homology theory and provide a foundation for a well-defined cylindrical contact homology, while still providing an invariant of the contact structure. A later talk will provide us with a large class of examples under which one can compute a well-defined version of cylindrical contact homology via a new approach the speaker developed for her thesis that is distinct and completely independent of previous specialized attempts.
Jennifer Taback (Bowdoin)
The geometry of twisted conjugacy classes in Diestel-Leader groups
The problem of computing the Reidemsieter number R(f) of a group automorphism f, that is, the number of f-twisted conjugacy classes, is related to questions in Lefschetz-Nielsen fixed point theory. We say a group has property R-infinity if every group automorphism has infinitely many twisted conjugacy classes. This property has been studied by Fel’shtyn, Gonzalves, Wong, Lustig, Levitt and others, and has applications outside of topology.
Twisted conjugacy classes in lamplighter groups are well understood both geometrically and algebraically. In particular the lamplighter group L_n does not have property R-infinity iff (n,6)=1. In this talk I will extend these results to Diestel-Leader groups with a surprisingly different conclusion. The family of Diestel-Leader groups provides a natural geometric generalization of the lamplighter groups. I will define these groups, as well as Diestel-Leader graphs and describe how these results include a computation of the automorphism group of this family. This is joint work with Melanie Stein and Peter Wong.
Jenny Wilson (Chicago)
FI-modules for Weyl groups
Earlier this year, Church, Ellenberg, and Farb developed a new framework for studying sequences of representations of the symmetric groups, using a concept they call an FI--module. I will give an overview of this theory, and describe how it generalizes to sequences of representations of the classical Weyl groups in Type B/C and D. The theory of FI--modules has provided a wealth of new results by numerous authors working in algebra, geometry, and topology. I will outline some of these results, including applications to configurations spaces and groups related to the braid group.
Jonah Gaster (UIC)
A Non-Injective Skinning Map with a Critical Point
Following Thurston, certain classes of 3-manifolds yield holomorphic maps on the Teichmuller spaces of their boundary components. Inspired by numerical evidence of Kent and Dumas, we present a negative result about the regularity of such maps. Namely, we construct a path of deformations of the hyperbolic structure on a genus-2 handlebody, with two rank-1 cusps. The presence of some extra symmetry yields information about the convex core, which is used to conclude some inequalities involving the extremal length of a certain symmetric curve family. The existence of a critical point for the associated skinning map follows.
Shinpei Baba (Caltech)
Grafting and complex projective structures
A complex projective structure is a certain geometric structure on a (real) surface, and it corresponds a representation from the fundamental group of the base surface into PSL(2,C). We discuss about a certain surgery operation, called a 2π–grafting, which produces a different projective structure, preserving its holonomy representation. This surgery is closely related to three-dimensional hyperbolic geometry.
Kathryn Mann (Chicago)
The group structure of diffeomorphism groups
Abstract: What is the relationship between manifolds and the structure of their diffeomorphism groups? On the positive side, a remarkable theorem of Filipkiewicz says that the group structure determines the manifold: if Diff(M) and Diff(N) are isomorphic, then M and N are diffeomorphic. On the negative side, we know little else. Could the group Diff(M) act by diffeomorphisms on M in nonstandard ways? Does the "size" of Diff(M) say anything about the complexity of M? Ghys asked if M and N are manifolds, and the group of compactly supported diffeomorphisms of N injects into the group of compactly supported diffeomorphisms of M, can the dimension of M be less than dim(N)? We'll discuss these and other questions, and answer these in the (already quite rich) case of dim(M)=1.
Archive of past Geometry seminars
2011-2012: Geometry_and_Topology_Seminar_2011-2012
2010: Fall-2010-Geometry-Topology