Difference between revisions of "SIAM Student Chapter Seminar"
From UW-Math Wiki
(→Abstract) |
|||
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
− | *'''When:''' | + | *'''When:''' Every other Friday at 1:30 pm |
− | *'''Where:''' | + | *'''Where:''' B333 Van Vleck Hall |
*'''Organizers:''' [http://www.math.wisc.edu/~xshen/ Xiao Shen] | *'''Organizers:''' [http://www.math.wisc.edu/~xshen/ Xiao Shen] | ||
*'''Faculty advisers:''' [http://www.math.wisc.edu/~jeanluc/ Jean-Luc Thiffeault], [http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~swright/ Steve Wright] | *'''Faculty advisers:''' [http://www.math.wisc.edu/~jeanluc/ Jean-Luc Thiffeault], [http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~swright/ Steve Wright] | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | == | + | == Spring 2020 == |
{| cellpadding="8" | {| cellpadding="8" | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Sept. 27, Oct. 4 | |Sept. 27, Oct. 4 | ||
− | |[ | + | |[https://lorenzonajt.github.io/ Lorenzo Najt] (Math) |
− | |''[[# | + | |''[[#Jan 31, Lorenzo Najt (Math)|Ensemble methods for measuring gerrymandering: Algorithmic problems and inferential challenges]]'' |
|- | |- | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 48: | Line 26: | ||
== Abstracts == | == Abstracts == | ||
− | === | + | === Jan 31, Lorenzo Najt (Math) === |
− | ''' | + | '''Ensemble methods for measuring gerrymandering: Algorithmic problems and inferential challenges''' |
− | + | We will review some recent work regarding measuring gerrymandering by sampling from the space of maps, including two methods used in a recent amicus brief to the supreme court. This discussion will highlight some of the computational challenges of this approach, including some complexity-theory lower bounds and bottlenecks in Markov chains. We will examine the robustness of these statistical methods through their connection to phase transitions in the self-avoiding walk model, as well as their dependence on artifacts of discretization. This talk is largely based on https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08881 | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | == Past Semesters == | |
+ | *[[SIAM_Student_Chapter_Seminar/Fall2019|Fall 2019]] | ||
+ | *[[SIAM_Student_Chapter_Seminar/Fall2018|Fall 2018]] | ||
+ | *[[SIAM_Student_Chapter_Seminar/Spring2017|Spring 2017]] |
Latest revision as of 19:41, 28 January 2020
- When: Every other Friday at 1:30 pm
- Where: B333 Van Vleck Hall
- Organizers: Xiao Shen
- Faculty advisers: Jean-Luc Thiffeault, Steve Wright
- To join the SIAM Chapter mailing list: email [join-siam-chapter@lists.wisc.edu].
Spring 2020
date | speaker | title |
---|---|---|
Sept. 27, Oct. 4 | Lorenzo Najt (Math) | Ensemble methods for measuring gerrymandering: Algorithmic problems and inferential challenges |
Abstracts
Jan 31, Lorenzo Najt (Math)
Ensemble methods for measuring gerrymandering: Algorithmic problems and inferential challenges
We will review some recent work regarding measuring gerrymandering by sampling from the space of maps, including two methods used in a recent amicus brief to the supreme court. This discussion will highlight some of the computational challenges of this approach, including some complexity-theory lower bounds and bottlenecks in Markov chains. We will examine the robustness of these statistical methods through their connection to phase transitions in the self-avoiding walk model, as well as their dependence on artifacts of discretization. This talk is largely based on https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08881