However, a perhaps more useful formulation of the Baire Category Theorem based on "separably closed" (vs. "closed") sets is not provable in RCA_0 nor in the stronger system WKL_0. These two definitions for closed sets are not equivalent under the more restrictive subsystems of second-order arithmetic; Prof. Lempp has presented in Math 975 a proof that "separably closed" and "closed" sets being equivalent requires the even stronger system ACA_0.
Douglas Brown, from whose thesis much of this talk comes, and his advisor Stephen Simpson introduced additional axioms, construction a system they called RCA_0^+. Within RCA_0^+ they were able to prove this other formulation of the Baire Category Theorem (which they called B.C.T. II). Michael Mytilinaios and Ted Slaman subsequently showed that there was a model in which B.C.T. II held but RCA_0^+ failed; so RCA_0^+ is not equivalent to B.C.T. II; the rest of this talk comes from their proof.