Southern Wisconsin Logic Colloquium
Logic Picnic
Thanks to Dan Rosendorf for organizing a great picnic, and to Kostas Beros
and Manli Miller for grilling!
SWLC Schedule
Refreshments will be served in the 9th floor lounge a half hour before talks,
or immediately following the talks. Please check the schedule
below. All talks will be in 901 Van Vleck Hall unless stated otherwise.
| Date
| Time
| Speaker
| Title
| Cookies, dinner, etc.
|
Tuesday, May 13 (tentative date)
| 2:30 p.m.
| Dilip Raghavan
| MADness in Set Theory (thesis defense, see
abstract)
| wine/cheese etc. at 3:30 p.m. and 5 p.m.
|
| 4:00 p.m.
| James Hunter
| Higher-order reverse topology (thesis defense, see
abstract)
|
Math 873 in fall 2008
Title:Advanced Topics in Foundations: Effective Randomness
Instructor: Joe Miller
Prereq: Math 773
Description:
Martin-Löf defined the random binary sequences as those which pass
certain effectively presented statistical tests. Levin and Chaitin
both used a form of Kolmogorov complexity to characterize Martin-Löf
randomness in terms of incompressibility, while Schnorr gave a
characterization in terms of betting games. Thus we have three
equivalent formulations of effective randomness which can be seen as
formalizing three different fundamental intuitions: random sequences
are "unremarkable", "incompressible" and "unpredictable". This course
will introduce Kolmogorov complexity, effective randomness, effective
Hausdorff dimension, triviality and lowness. We will go from the basic
definitions to recent results and open questions of current interest.
Students should have had an introductory course in computability theory.
Abstracts of talks
I plan to summarize the contents of my three papers "There is a
Van Douwen MAD family", "Strongly and Very MAD families of Functions" and
"Consistency of no Gregory Trees with large Continuum". These are all
available on my website. They also constitute my thesis. As time permits, I
will outline the ideas in the proof of the result in the third paper. That
paper is joint work with Kunen.
Hunter's talk:
Higher-order reverse topology
Traditional reverse-mathematics limits itself to examining
second-order sentences - statements involving only natural numbers and sets
of natural numbers. For reverse topology, this limitation effectively limits
the scope of discourse to countably-based topologies on spaces of size
continuum - where the relation determining whether a point is in some open
set is given by some fixed second-order formula. By instead starting with a
base theory in all finite types, we are able to analyze the strength of
certain third-order topological statements that cannot be expressed in a
second-order language.
Prepared by
Steffen Lempp
(lempp@math.wisc.edu)