Weak $ \mathfrak{sl}_2$-categorifications

R. Virk


Department of Mathematics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706

virk@math.wisc.edu

Put $ e=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\ 0&0\end{pmatrix}$, $ f=\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\ 1&0\end{pmatrix}$ and $ h=ef-fe=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\ 0&-1\end{pmatrix}$. Then $ e,f,h$ give a basis for the Lie algebra $ \mathfrak{sl}_2$.

Let $ \mathcal{C}$ be an artinian abelian category with Grothendieck group $ K(\mathcal{C})$. Following [CR08], a weak $ \mathfrak{sl}_2$-categorification is the data of an adjoint pair $ (E,F)$ of exact endofunctors of $ \mathcal{C}$ such that

We put $ E_+=E$, $ E_-=F$ and $ e_{\pm}=[E_{\pm}]$. By the weight space of an object of $ \mathcal{C}$, we will mean the weight space of its class (whenever this is meaningful).

Let $ V$ be a locally finite representation of $ \mathfrak{sl}_2$. Given $ \lambda \in \mathbb{Z}$, we denote by $ V_{\lambda}$ the weight space of $ V$ for the weight $ \lambda$. For $ v\in V$ let

$\displaystyle h_{\pm}(v)=\max\{n\geq 0\,\vert\, e_{\pm}^n\neq 0\}.$

Proposition 0.0.1   [CR08, Proposition 5.5] Fix a weak $ \mathfrak{sl}_2$-categorification of $ \mathcal{C}$ and let $ V=\mathbb{Q}\otimes K(\mathcal{C})$. Let $ \mathcal{C}_{\lambda}$ be the full subcategory of objects of whose class is in $ V_{\lambda}$. Then, $ \mathcal{C}=\bigoplus_{\lambda}\mathcal{C}_{\lambda}$. In particular, the class of an indecomposable object of $ \mathcal{C}$ is a weight vector.

Proof. Let $ L_1$ and $ L_2$ be simple objects in different weight spaces. Then, there is $ \varepsilon\in\{\pm\}$ and $ \{i,j\}=\{1,2\}$ such that $ h_{\varepsilon}(L_i) > h_{\varepsilon}(L_j)$. Set $ r=h_{\varepsilon}(L_i)$. Suppose $ M$ is an extension of $ L_1$ by $ L_2$. Then, $ E_{\varepsilon}^rM \cong E_{\varepsilon}^rL_i\neq 0$. So, all the composition factors of $ E_{-\varepsilon}^rE_{\varepsilon}^rM$ are in the same weight space as $ L_i$. Now,

$\displaystyle \mathrm{Hom}(E_{-\varepsilon}^rE_{\varepsilon}^rM, M)\cong\mathrm...
...M,E_{\varepsilon}^rM)\cong\mathrm{Hom}(M, E_{-\varepsilon}^rE_{\varepsilon}^rM)$

and these spaces are not zero. So $ M$ has a non-zero simple quotient and a non-zero simple submodule in the same weight space as $ L_i$. Hence, $ L_i$ is both a submodule and quotient of $ M$. Consequently $ M=L_1\oplus L_2$.

Thus, $ \mathrm{Ext}^1(L_1,L_2)=0$ whenever $ L_1$ and $ L_2$ are simple objects in different weight spaces. $ \qedsymbol$





virk 2008-05-17