Difference between revisions of "NTS Spring 2013/Abstracts"
From UW-Math Wiki
(start page up) |
(→January 31: prettify) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
− | Abstract: Consider an elliptic curve E. The explicit formula for E relates a sum involving the numbers | + | Abstract: Consider an elliptic curve ''E''. The explicit formula for ''E'' relates a sum involving the numbers ''a<sub>p''</sub>(''E'') to a sum of three quantities, one involving the analytic rank of the curve, another involving the zeros of the ''L''-series of the curve, and the third, a bounded error term. Barry Mazur and I are attempting to see how numerically explicit – for particular examples – we can make each term in this formula. I'll explain this adventure in a bit more detail, show some plots, and explain what they represent. |
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> |
Revision as of 22:08, 16 January 2013
January 24
Tamar Ziegler (Technion) |
Title: tba |
Abstract: tba |
January 31
William Stein (U. of Washington) |
Title: How explicit is the explicit formula? |
Abstract: Consider an elliptic curve E. The explicit formula for E relates a sum involving the numbers a_{p}(E) to a sum of three quantities, one involving the analytic rank of the curve, another involving the zeros of the L-series of the curve, and the third, a bounded error term. Barry Mazur and I are attempting to see how numerically explicit – for particular examples – we can make each term in this formula. I'll explain this adventure in a bit more detail, show some plots, and explain what they represent. |
February 7
Nigel Boston (Madison) |
Title: A refined conjecture on factoring iterates of polynomials over finite fields |
Abstract: tba |
Organizer contact information
Sean Rostami
Return to the Number Theory Seminar Page
Return to the Algebra Group Page